Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:50
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Two More Persona 4 Actors Have Said They're Not Returning for an Unannounced Persona 4 Remake - IGN
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Michaels completes acquisition of Joann’s intellectual property and fan-favorite labels - Boston.com
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
BYU could make noise at NCAA championship 'if big guns show up' - Deseret News
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Are You Mean When You're Overstimulated? There's Actually A Reason For That. - HuffPost
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
After Being Called "Rude," Miley Cyrus Seemingly Addressed Her Recent Signing Event - BuzzFeed
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
We finally may be able to rid the world of mosquitoes. But should we? - The Washington Post
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
HBO’s New Movie Fiercely Splits Critics & Audiences On Rotten Tomatoes - Screen Rant